Ranking
-
1
1ST PHORM
Hydration Sport
9.3
composite
$1.541per g sodium
-
2
REDCON1
Canteen
8.5
composite
$2.221per g sodium
-
3
ASCENT PROTEIN
Citrus Clean Hydration Energy
8.1
composite
$2.499per g sodium
Filter
| 1 | 9.27 | 100% | 8.3 | 10.0 | $1.541 | |
| 2 | 8.52 | 100% | 7.1 | 8.6 | $2.221 | |
| 3 | 8.07 | 85% | 6.3 | 9.3 | $2.499 | |
| 4 | 7.97 | 100% | 5.0 | 10.0 | $3.332 | |
| 5 | 7.47 | 85% | 5.4 | 8.4 | $2.999 | |
| 6 | 7.45 | 85% | 4.6 | 10.0 | $4.039 | |
| 7 | 6.58 | 100% | 1.7 | 10.0 | $7.398 | |
| 8 | 6.47 | 85% | 2.5 | 10.0 | $5.498 | |
| 9 | 6.42 | 85% | 2.9 | 8.9 | $4.614 | |
| 10 | 6.27 | 100% | 3.3 | 5.0 | $4.544 | |
| 11 | 6.14 | 100% | 0.4 | 10.0 | $9.695 | |
| 12 | 10.00 | 65% | 10.0 | not enough data | $0.444 | |
| 13 | 9.74 | 65% | 9.6 | not enough data | $0.868 | |
| 14 | 9.49 | 65% | 9.2 | not enough data | $1.166 | |
| 15 | 9.31 | 80% | 8.8 | not enough data | $1.250 | |
| 16 | 8.72 | 65% | 7.9 | not enough data | $1.713 | |
| 17 | 8.46 | 65% | 7.5 | not enough data | $1.896 | |
| 18 | 7.95 | 65% | 6.7 | not enough data | $2.499 | |
| 19 | 7.43 | 65% | 5.8 | not enough data | $2.868 | |
| 20 | 6.41 | 65% | 4.2 | not enough data | $4.100 | |
| 21 | 6.15 | 65% | 3.8 | not enough data | $4.542 | |
| 22 | 6.00 | 80% | 2.1 | not enough data | $7.244 | |
| 23 | 4.90 | 80% | 0.0 | not enough data | $9.997 | |
| 24 | 4.62 | 65% | 1.3 | not enough data | $7.769 | |
| 25 | 4.36 | 65% | 0.8 | not enough data | $8.724 | |
| 26 | not enough data | 40% | not enough data | not enough data | not enough data |
Click a column header to sort. not enough data means the number could not be verified from the label or price on record — never estimated.
How this ranking is built
| Component | Weight | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Value | 40% | Cost per gram of sodium, ranked against the category — sodium is the one electrolyte a Nutrition Facts panel must quantify, so it is the only like-for-like denominator |
| Label disclosure | 25% | Share of the actives the label puts a number against. An amount hidden in a proprietary blend, or simply not stated, scores zero here rather than counting as missing data — non-disclosure is a fact about a label, not an absence of one |
| Formula | 20% | Sugar load and calorie load per serving, read from the panel |
| Consensus | 15% | Buyer rating from the brand’s own storefront or its retail listing (source-linked), minimum 25 reviews, count and source printed on every product page |
A missing component is never scored as zero. Its weight is redistributed across the components that exist, and the page says which one was omitted.
Head to head
The same numbers as above, two products at a time.