Independent supplement ratings
Gym Products Scored on Published Arithmetic
Every product scored the same way — cost per gram, clinical dose auditing, sourced buyer consensus. Weighted, capped, and never moved by an affiliate link.
Last audit update: October 5, 2026 · Same published formula for every category
Browse the rankings
All rankings →Top rated right now
All rankings →
NUTRABIO№ 01
Base Pre Workout
Pre-workout
10.0Composite / 10100% of weighting Full record →
HORBAACH№ 02
Creatine Monohydrate 2.2lb Powder
creatine
10.0Composite / 1085% of weighting Full record →
BULKSUPPLEMENTS№ 03
BCAA 2:1:1 Branched Chain Amino Acids Powder
amino-acids
9.9Composite / 10100% of weighting Full record →
The two numbers
Both are computed from a product's own label and its current price. Neither is a matter of taste, and both can be recalculated by anyone who wants to check.
-
01
Cost per gram of protein
Price divided by the protein in the package. A tub that looks cheap on the shelf is often expensive per gram, and the ranking that matters is rarely the one on the price tag.
-
02
Clinical dose auditing
Every active measured against the dose used in published research — 27 thresholds, each with its citation and its evidence grade printed beside it. A “6 g performance blend” is underdosed on citrulline alone, and the blend is what hides it.
-
03
If the readers disagree, it doesn’t publish
Most panels are read from the label image by two independent readers. If their readings disagree on a single value, the product is held back — never published with a number we are unsure of. Where a brand publishes its panel as machine-readable data, that is parsed instead, and the product page says so.
Field guides
All guides →Why proprietary blends get penalised
A blend lists its ingredients but not their individual doses. That is legal, common, and makes the formula unauditable: a label can print citrulline, beta-alanine and caffeine inside a 750 mg blend when a clinical dose of citrulline alone is 6,000 mg.
Since a blend hides whether the dose is real, an ingredient inside one is scored as undosed rather than assumed adequate, and the product carries an explicit penalty. If a brand discloses its doses, that shows up in its score.
What is published, and what is not
The rated products are live. Most had their supplement facts panel read from the label image by two independent readers, and only the products whose two readings agreed on every value were published. Where the readings disagreed — even on a single ingredient — the product is held back rather than published with a number we are unsure of. The rest were parsed from a brand’s own machine-readable nutrition data; every product page names the extraction path it came from.
Where a brand publishes its panel as machine-readable text, a single structured read suffices and the record says so. Dozens more image-only panels are transcribed and waiting on a second or third independent reading before they can appear.
Aggregated buyer sentiment is live where it can be sourced: the rating a brand publishes on its own product page, counted and linked at every use, and scored only when at least 25 reviews stand behind it. Where no machine-readable rating exists, the component is omitted and the page says so — never a number invented to fill a column.
On affiliate links. Some links on this site earn a commission, and every page carrying one says so. No brand pays for a rating, and no rating changes because a brand enrolled. Any product can be rated whether or not there is money in it.
Read how the ratings are calculated for the full method, including the dose thresholds and their sources.
Every number on this site traces to a source you can open.